When a man ties mangalasutram around a woman’s neck, they are said to be married. Thus “mangalasutram” symbolizes marriage and hence deemed as an important part of any married woman. Over the years, or I should say centuries, lot of sentiments arouse around it. Some of the accepted norms or sentiments include -
- “Mangalsutram represents the long life of the husband”
- “It is so sacred and thus should be worshiped”
- “Not wearing it continuously will cause harm to the husband” etc and etc.
The extent of drama around it can be understood better from movies from a decade or more ago – where women even go to the extent of preferring “mangalsutram” to the one who ties it or put their lives on stake to safeguard it. It is true that it is a symbol of marriage, which ideally follows that it is a symbol of love, trust and commitment between a man and a woman (assuming that people get married out of love, mutual trust and commitment). But when more and more emphasis is placed on only the symbol and not on what it symbolizes, it becomes a big joke.
When one really thinks about it, one can discern the reason for this undue importance attached to the “mangalasutram” and the high extent of sentimentalism involved with it – It provides the society a means to control women. Following that “mangalasutram” is the symbol of marriage, we conveniently ignore the fact that married men wear nothing to announce their married status. By projecting the mangalasutram as the identity of a married woman, society succeeded in keeping women in the place it wanted to. In our culture, the importance of marriage in every one’s life cannot be overemphasized. While it is true for both the genders, it is especially so in the case of women. Women born to get married (and of course, bear children), period. This follows that “mangalasutram” becomes the most valuable possession of a woman not because of the person who places it around her neck but because it is just so. While women until the previous generation accepted its importance and role without a murmur, today’s woman doesn’t seem to follow suit. She questions the norms, and even deviates from them.
I’ve noticed a clear change in the thinking and perception of today’s women about it. While they respect it for what it symbolizes, they don’t attach excessive importance to it. They don’t wear it regularly and when they do wear it, it is because they want to, not because they are expected to do so. Some women even see it only as a piece of jewelry.
I don’t mean to imply that everyone is like that. (Not that there is any problem for me with that.
) Women of the current generation have largely varying attitudes about this whole issue. What I want to point out is that women today want to take the choice of following whatever norms that are in existence into their hands.
This attitude seems blasphemous not only to religious groups and activists but also to many common people in the society, whose reaction to the new change is usually something along the lines of “That is the norm. Ancestors cannot be wrong. We have to follow our tradition, period.”
Another argument is – If everyone behaves as they like, there will be no order in the world. Well, I tend to agree with this point. For there to be order in society, there have to be some rules. But if more and more people are not obeying the rules, the problem is not with the people, it is with the rules. Change them to suit the current thinking. Blindly following the age-old practices may not be a good idea. Rules are for the people, not the other way around.
I don’t mean to imply that I’m against this “mangalsutram” or that it should be abolished or something like that. I currently take no sides. This is a very controversial and hot topic and I found it interesting to see different perceptions about the concept. I’ve seen/read a few online discussions on how today’s women perceive “mangalasutram” and I must say they are stimulating and revealing. My response in one of the forums:
Thinking about this a little bit more objectively, I feel that mangalasutra is predominantly a symbol – to let people/society know that one is married. This is important because it avoids a lot of confusion and trouble. There can be other ways too but a symbol makes the classification easier and instantaneous. All the other sentiments emerged out of man’s ego or woman’s (perceived) lower status or religion or need to dominate and control etc. So, people kind of expect a married woman to showcase that symbol. Ideally, this is required by both men and women, Actually, men also have some symbol (like jenjam) but the society has overlooked that part very conveniently long long back. Double standards for men and women didn’t born just yesterday. Since society could enforce that on women and had a wonderfully success rate throughout several centuries, it continues to do so even today. From that perspective, there is no reason for it to change its expectation. If today’s women think that they need not showcase to the world that they are married, or use that particular symbol to do so, it will take a lot of time for the society to get used to it and accept it. It’s long way and until then the struggle, cultural and emotional attacks, discrimination go on. The same is true not only for this particular issue but for all the other gender specific issues. It is very difficult to change deep-rooted beliefs. Mere scientific and logical explanations won’t work. People should be willing to accept new ideas and this is a herculean task. But of course, all this doesn’t stop progress or change.[ I have a problem at labeling every new thought as progressive thought. Every change may not be progressive in nature, unless the long-term repercussions are carefully considered. I believe one cannot say whether something is progressive or not right away; especially when it does not deal with atrocities like Sati: which directly harms a section of people. While creating mental and psychological snares is equally or more fiendish, its effect is subtle and so deep-rooted that it is often difficult even to recognize it.] There have been many changes to the lifestyle and customs in the past. No reason why it will not happen to more and more things in future.
And moreover, “mangalasutra” is a symbol for the institution of marriage [for the facility of society] – not mental commitment. Since there is no way to convey or detect mental commitment, people rely on physical and tangible things to make some sense of mental concepts. For example, in the legal world, whether you are committed to your spouse doesn’t matter as long as you have your marriage certificate and/or your marriage is not annulled or divorced. This is not the flaw of a system or religion or society. This is just how things can work. [The bottom line is "love and commitment between the couple" attaches importance to mangalasutra, not the other way around.]




